Cause the crash, pay the price (of a courtesy car)

Cause the crash, pay the price (of a courtesy car)

Court of Appeal upholds High Court decision on liability for cost of hiring replacement car

Frucor Beverages Limited and Ors v Blumberg and Ors [2019] NZCA 547

The Court of Appeal recently upheld the High Court decision of Blumberg v Frucor Beverages Ltd, finding that an at-fault driver (or their insurer) is liable for the cost of a not-at-fault driver’s replacement hire vehicle following a collision. 

Read More

2019 Client Function

2019 Client Function

On Thursday 17 October, we held our annual client function. This year we had an ‘Area 51 & Other Conspiracies’ theme and enjoyed getting creative and dressing up as everything from extra-terrestrials to US military personnel. A special mention to partner Matthew Atkinson who had most of his body painted blue! It was a weird and wonderful evening and we were thrilled to see some of our clients donning handmade tinfoil hats in the spirit of the occasion. Thank you all for coming along, and we look forward to next year’s even

Read More

Mental Health Awareness Week at FL

Last week, we at Fee Langstone took some time out of our busy days for mindfulness and self-care as part of Mental Health Awareness Week. Each day we enjoyed a different wellness activity.

FL Staff working hard at Eat My Lunch HQ

FL Staff working hard at Eat My Lunch HQ

On Monday, we got a chance to showcase our culinary skills helping prepare and pack lunches with the amazing volunteers at Eat My Lunch.  This business works to ensure that for every lunch purchased, one is provided to a school child. To check out their great work visit: https://www.eatmylunch.nz/

On Tuesday, a group of solicitors and support staff took some time to calm and centre ourselves with lunchtime yoga.  This gave us the opportunity to slow down and relieve stress, while also reducing muscle tension.

Mindfulness Colouring (inside the lines of course!)

Mindfulness Colouring (inside the lines of course!)

Wednesday was an inside kind of day, and we had fun with some mindful colouring-in.  While being a pleasurable pastime in itself, mindful colouring has been shown to decrease anxiety and lessen symptoms of stress.   

We braved stormy weather on Thursday lunchtime to walk the pink Lightpath. (Reports of thunder and lightning may have been greatly exaggerated.)  Kit, our fantastic, fluffy Associate (pictured), led the way. If you are looking for walks around the Auckland region check out: https://at.govt.nz/cycling-walking/cycle-walking-maps/

Kit, Senior Fluff Associate

Kit, Senior Fluff Associate

We wrapped up the week with a delicious morning tea.  Taking note of what we had learned at yoga earlier in the week about balance, there were healthy treats, but balanced by not so healthy sausage rolls!  





Just following orders?

Just following orders?

A, B and C v D and E Limited [2019] NZHC 992

Could a lawyer be liable to disappointed children for a client’s decision to transfer assets to a trust?

One of the fundamental duties of a solicitor is to implement the instructions given to him or her by a client.  But what if those instructions are morally dubious?  Where a third party suffers a loss, can the lawyer say that he or she was only following instructions?  The answer is a clear ‘no’ if the client’s instruction relates to a breach of the client’s fiduciary duties.  A recent case suggests that such breaches might be more common than previously thought.   

Read More

Down to the nuts and bolts

Down to the nuts and bolts

J & NA Shanks Ltd v Heli Support New Zealand Ltd [2019] NZHC 1615

Oscar Wilde once wrote, “life imitates art far more than art imitates life”.  

It seems that this applies to litigation as well.  Pauline Davies and Sam Learmonth recently acted for the plaintiff in a five-day High Court trial, seeking recovery of a payment made by insurers to a helicopter owner after the helicopter was damaged in a crash.  The defendant was a maintenance engineer and it was alleged that the crash was caused by negligent workmanship. After the trial, Pauline and Sam were surprised to find that the issue in dispute had already been discussed in some detail in John Grisham’s novel, Gray Mountain.  

Read More

Get to know Hannah

In her last two years of school Hannah was set on studying chemical or civil engineering at university but instead she chose law and French and graduated from Auckland University with an LLB and BA. 

She gained fluency in French not just through study here but in immersion in France. First came an exchange trip through school and then, in her final year of her degrees, an exchange semester at Université Jean Moulin in Lyon where she combined both disciplines by taking law papers taught in French. She studied translation at university and has carried out some translation of legal work. 

Hannah started out her legal career at a litigation firm in Auckland, primarily acting for homeowners in disputes arising from the Canterbury earthquakes. She was admitted in March 2019 and started at Fee Langstone in August 2019.

"Insurance law attracts me because it is unique as while it is a specialised area of practice, it applies to a wide variety of disputes, with insureds ranging from individuals to multinational companies. The different areas of expertise in so many fields fascinate me."

"In my experience so far, like others, I think what really sets Fee Langstone apart is the people. I’m lucky to be joining a firm where everyone is highly skilled at what they do but equally very welcoming and down to earth." 

When asked to list three things still left on her bucket list she replied: "Go skydiving, visit Antarctica, and learn more languages. I want to learn the language of every new place I visit as soon as I get there."

You never know. Perhaps Fee Langstone will get an instruction requiring someone to jump from a Hercules aircraft into the Argentinian base.

Hannah joined Fee Langstone around the same time as here. Read more about her here

High Court illuminates rights and remedies for breach of good faith duty

High Court illuminates rights and remedies for breach of good faith duty

Taylor v Asteron Life Ltd [2018] NZHC 2939

The decision of Taylor v Asteron Life Ltd is important because it upholds an insurer’s right to cancel and seek damages from an insured guilty of making a fraudulent claim.  Rather than applying common law principles of the duty of good faith, the insurer’s remedies were dealt with under the Contracts and Commercial Law Act 2017 (CCL Act).

Read More

The Brown Marmorated Stink Bug: Watch This Space

The Brown Marmorated Stink Bug:  Watch This Space

The brown marmorated stink bug (Halyomorpha halys) is a native of China, Japan, Korea and Taiwan and is a serious agricultural pest in all places where it has become established, including the USA and parts of Europe and Canada.  The prospect of the stink bug becoming established in New Zealand is regarded by the local horticulture industry as a matter of serious concern, with an NZIER report published in February 2018 estimating that this could wipe up to $3.6bn from New Zealand’s GDP by 2038.

Read More

Mainzeal: quantum assessment moves in a new direction

Mainzeal: quantum assessment moves in a new direction

Mainzeal Property and Constructions Ltd (in Liq) v Yan and Others [2019] NZHC 255

In February of this year, the High Court upheld claims of reckless trading against the former directors of Mainzeal Property and Construction Limited (Mainzeal). The Court held the former directors had to pay $36 million, approximately one third of the $110 million owed to unsecured creditors.  The decision is important for a number of reasons, including an adoption of a novel approach to assessing the quantum of the award against the directors.

Read More

First Australian decision on liability for ACP Cladding – what does it mean for insurers?

First Australian decision on liability for ACP Cladding – what does it mean for insurers?

Owners Corporation No.1 PS613436T & Ors v LU Simon Builders Pty Ltd & Ors [2019] VCAT 286

Early morning on 25 November 2014, a resident of the Lacrosse Apartment building, in Melbourne, extinguished a cigarette in a makeshift ashtray sitting on a timber table on his balcony.  A small fire started in the plastic ashtray, spreading to the table and then to the external cladding of the building. The cladding was made of Aluminium Composite Panels (ACP). These panels had a core containing highly flammable polyethylene, which was not compliant with the Building Code of Australia (BCA). The fire spread quickly up the side of the building, racing up thirteen floors in roughly fifteen minutes and causing extensive damage.

Read More