Commerce Commission v Lodge Real Estate Limited [2020] NZHC 2329
In our April blog we summarised the effect of the Supreme Court’s decision in the Trade Me/real estate agents price-fixing saga. On dismissal of the real estate agents’ appeal, the Supreme Court referred the matter back to the High Court for determination of the penalty to be paid by Lodge Real Estate and Monarch Real Estate.
The partners are very pleased to announce that Brad and Angus have been promoted to the new role of Special Counsel. Brad has been with the firm 12 years, and Angus since 2014. These promotions recognise their experience and the high regard in which they are held by the partners. We would like to wish them both continued success, and to thank them for their valuable contribution to the continued success of the firm.
Read MoreAs regular readers know, Fee Langstone has been providing updates on the UK “test case” on the Business Interruption response to Covid-19 claims as the case has proceeded through the Court.
To recap, the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) had brought the Covid-19 “test case” with the aim of bringing clarity to areas of uncertainty for as many policyholders and insurers as possible. A sample of twenty-one policy wordings issued by eight insurers was considered, with the FCA putting forward policyholders’ arguments in the public interest.
Read MoreDept of Internal Affairs v OTT Trading Group Ltd [2020] NZHC 1663
In this decision, the Department of Internal Affairs (the Department) claimed that between May 2014 and April 2019, OTT Trading Group (OTT) and MSI Group Limited (MSI) breached their obligations under the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act 2009 (the Act).
Maritime New Zealand v Fullers Group Ltd [2020] NZDC 10157
The lesser known alternative to a traditional fine given under the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 (HSWA) is the use of health and safety project orders.
Read MoreIn yet another instance of a non-financial sanction given under the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 (HSWA), a court-ordered enforceable undertaking pursuant to s156 of the HSWA has been imposed for the first time in New Zealand, instead of a traditional fine.
Read MoreAfter two years in Melbourne, Associate Morgan is back in Auckland and ready to take on new challenges at FL.
Read MoreWe are delighted to welcome back Senior Solicitor Imogen Allan to the FL team.
Read MoreR v Brisbane Auto Recycling Pty Ltd & Ors [2020] QDC 113
In our February 2020 issue of In Brief, we discussed how two further Australian jurisdictions (Victoria and the Northern Territory) had passed workplace manslaughter laws. Now, Australia has had its first workplace manslaughter sentence. The sentence was imposed in Queensland, pursuant to workplace manslaughter laws, which have been in force since 2017 following an amendment to Queensland’s Workplace Health and Safety Act 2011.
Read MoreAttorney-General v Strathboss Kiwifruit Limited [2020] NZCA 98
In this recent decision, the Court of Appeal found that the Crown was immune from liability to kiwifruit growers and post-harvest operators in negligence for granting an import permit for a consignment of kiwifruit pollen from China and for not inspecting those goods when they arrived in New Zealand. Further, even if the immunity had not been made out, the Court found no duty of care in any event.
Daisley v Ark Contractors Limited [2020] NZHC 793
Fee Langstone was recently involved in a High Court trial which has shed light on the fiduciary duty that arises from a joint venture arrangement. It also usefully affirms the requirement that there be a contract of retainer or assumption of responsibility to a party involved in a transaction before a lawyer will owe fiduciary duties to that party.
Read MoreUK Financial Conduct Authority to bring COVID-19 test case for business interruption claims
The COVID-19 pandemic has been a hugely significant worldwide event. The pandemic and subsequent government controls have caused many businesses – in particular SMEs – distress and substantial losses. Most claims for COVID-19-related business interruption (BI) losses have been excluded in New Zealand because BI policies here generally do not cover losses resulting from pandemics. This is not always the case in other parts of the world.
The Federal Maritime Commission recently released its final interpretive rule concerning the reasonableness of detention and demurrage charges. The FMC’s announcement is a response to complaints of shippers, freight intermediaries and truckers of being penalised with unreasonable demurrage and detention charges by ocean carriers and terminal operators.
Read MoreLodge Real Estate Limited v Commerce Commission [2020] NZSC 25
The Supreme Court has recently delivered its judgment in the Trade Me/real estate agents price-fixing case, making this the final episode (on liability at least). Two Hamilton real estate agencies lost their seven-year battle against price-fixing allegations by the Commerce Commission.
Read MoreR v Southern Boundary Wines Ltd (in liq) [2020] NZHC 514
Two directors and an employee of Southern Boundary Wines Ltd (Southern Boundary) have been sentenced along with the company itself for charges under the Wine Act 2003 involving deception and selling and exporting non-compliant wines. This is the third sentencing to occur under the Act.
Read MoreIn June 2017, a fishing vessel, the Victory II, sank off Kaikōura while grossly overloaded with fish. In a prosecution brought by Maritime New Zealand, Antonio Basile, the sole director of the fishing company, Nino’s Ltd, became the first officer to be convicted and sentenced under the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 (HSWA). Nino’s Ltd was also sentenced, as was the Victory II’s skipper, Mr McCauley.
Read MoreWorkSafe NZ v Salter [2017] NZDC 26277
In 2017, Auckland business owner, Ron Salter, and his waste fuel collection business, Salters Cartage Ltd (Salters), were convicted for a series of breaches of the Health and Safety in Employment Act 1992 and the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996. The Police are now commencing proceedings against Mr Salter under the Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act 2009 (Act). This is the first time a proceeding has been brought under this Act in relation to a health and safety offending.
GDC v Aratu Forestry Ltd
This recent sentencing decision is notable for two reasons. First, because of the large fine imposed on a forestry company for breaching the Resource Management Act 1993 (RMA), and second – perhaps more interestingly – because the Court ordered the defendants to pay a significant sum in reparations to affected persons for emotional harm. While reparation payments are common for other kinds of offences, they are uncommon for convictions under the RMA. The case also raises issues such as whether a defendant is insured for reparation payments, and, if so, which insurance policy will provide cover?
Limitation periods for old insurance claims
Inicio Ltd v Tower Insurance Ltd [2020] NZHC 90
This recent High Court decision examines the effect of an acknowledgement of liability on the limitation period applying to an insurance claim.
Read MoreGeorge v Sell Smart Bis Ltd [2019] NZHC 37
Recently, the High Court decided that a claim for breach of fiduciary duty against a mortgage broker was barred under the Limitation Act 1950 (the Act). The Court applied by analogy the limitation period that applies to contractual/tortious claims. This decision is very important in clarifying the time limit which will apply to claims for breach of fiduciary duty, such as acting in a conflict of interest or failing to act honestly in the client’s interests.
Read MoreAt Fee Langstone we’re experts in the field of insurance law. We are a team of skilled litigation lawyers, able to work with you to provide strategies and robust solutions, fast.
Fee Langstone
Tel. +64 9 373 0050
Level 18, 51 Shortland Street
Auckland 1010
reception@feelangstone.co.nz
Fee Langstone at Ruby Black
201-203 High Street
Christchurch
